Thread Rating:
08-07-2026, 09:32 PM
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.
Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.
08-07-2026, 11:25 PM
Container queries are great but I still add a media-query fallback.
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
I disagree slightly, but I can see where you are coming from.
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
I disagree slightly, but I can see where you are coming from.
08-08-2026, 12:41 AM
Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.
Bumping this because I ran into the same thing today.
Bumping this because I ran into the same thing today.
08-08-2026, 02:00 AM
Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.
Good point, I had not thought of it that way.
Good point, I had not thought of it that way.
08-08-2026, 02:29 AM
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.
:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.
215
24
Feb 2026
08-08-2026, 04:19 AM
08-08-2026, 05:32 AM
Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
Interesting — I will have to try that.
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
Interesting — I will have to try that.
215
24
Feb 2026
08-08-2026, 07:15 AM
Container queries are great but I still add a media-query fallback.
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
08-08-2026, 08:49 AM
Container queries are great but I still add a media-query fallback.
:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.
Could not agree more.
:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.
Could not agree more.
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
