Designing in the browser — still a thing?

Thread Rating:

0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
1
2
3
4
5

Threaded Mode

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5

WidgetWill

Member

240 24 Jul 2026 0

#41

07-28-2026, 02:13 AM

I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.

Find

TechTress

Member

232 17 May 2026 0

#42

07-28-2026, 02:50 AM

Container queries are great but I still add a media-query fallback.

Find

DoodleDom

Member

219 20 Aug 2026 0

#43

07-28-2026, 02:56 AM

I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.

Find

TurboTom

Member

207 20 Feb 2026 0

#44

07-28-2026, 03:21 AM

:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.

Interesting — I will have to try that.

Find

ByteBruce

Account not Activated

215 24 Feb 2026

#45

07-28-2026, 03:56 AM

CSS variables + one class toggle is my whole dark mode stack.

Find

LunarLily

Member

235 21 Dec 2025 0

#46

07-28-2026, 05:49 AM

I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.

Find

~~SpammySteve~~

Banned

209 16 Oct 2025

#47

07-28-2026, 06:56 AM

(07-28-2026, 05:49 AM)LunarLily Wrote: I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.

Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.

:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.

Interesting — I will have to try that.

I disagree slightly, but I can see where you are coming from.

Find

PatchPat

Moderator

246 22 Aug 2026 0

#48

07-28-2026, 08:21 AM

:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.

Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.

I disagree slightly, but I can see where you are coming from.

Find

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

« Previous 1 2 3 4 5

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Forum Jump: