Theme demo: pick a theme on the right. Log in as demo / demo to try posting. Everything resets every night.
Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Threaded Mode
Member
***
247 17 Feb 2026 0
#1

:has() finally lets me style parents without JavaScript, and support is good now.

I design in the browser almost exclusively now; mockups only for client sign-off.

Dark mode is a one-liner media query once your colours live in variables.

Curious what everyone else here thinks about it.
Reply
Member
***
201 15 Dec 2025 0
#2

Container queries are great but I still add a media-query fallback.

Interesting — I will have to try that.

Nice thread, following for the replies.
Reply
Banned
209 16 Oct 2025
#3

(09-27-2026, 07:33 AM)SonicSam Wrote: Container queries are great but I still add a media-query fallback.
Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.

I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.
Reply
Administrator
*******
234 20 Nov 2026 0
#4

:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.

Could not agree more.
Reply
Super Moderator
******
231 26 Mar 2026 0
#5

I still reach for Bootstrap when a client needs to maintain it afterwards.

CSS variables + one class toggle is my whole dark mode stack.

Thanks for sharing, saved me a lot of time.
Reply
Member
***
235 21 Dec 2025 0
#6

Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.

Container queries are great but I still add a media-query fallback.
Reply
Super Moderator
******
226 15 Oct 2025 0
#7

:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.

Nice thread, following for the replies.
Reply
Member
***
231 20 Feb 2026 0
#8

Refactoring legacy CSS one component at a time is the only sane way.

CSS variables + one class toggle is my whole dark mode stack.

Bumping this because I ran into the same thing today.

Thanks for sharing, saved me a lot of time.
Reply
Member
***
247 17 Feb 2026 0
#9

:has() feels like cheating compared to what we used to do.
Reply

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Forum Jump: